> I don't doubt that, but would you seriously consider the ll patch for
> inclusion into the main kernel?
The mini ll patch definitely. The full ll one needs some head scratching to
be sure its correct. pre-empt is a 2.5 thing which in some ways is easier
because it doesnt matter if it breaks something.
> Please let me rephrase, I just don't expect terrible good latency
> numbers with non dma hardware.
Expect the same with DMA hardware too at times.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:42 EST