On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>
> > Nobody has answered my question about the conflict between SMP per-cpu caching
> > and preempt. Since NUMA is apparently the future of MP in the PC world and
> > the future of Linux servers, it's interesting to consider this tradeoff.
>
> Preempt is a UP feature so far.
I think this is a sufficient summary of your engineering approach.
...
> More of other FUD deleted, Victor, could you please stop this?
I guess that Andrew, Alan, Andrea and I all are raising objections that
you ignore because we have some kind of shared bias.
-- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:44 EST