On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On January 14, 2002 09:33 pm, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > try to replace :
> >
> > PRIO_TO_TIMESLICE() and RT_PRIO_TO_TIMESLICE() with :
> >
> > #define NICE_TO_TIMESLICE(n) (MIN_TIMESLICE + ((MAX_TIMESLICE - \
> > MIN_TIMESLICE) * ((n) + 20)) / 39)
> >
> >
> > NICE_TO_TIMESLICE(p->__nice)
>
> Not sure about this change. gkrellm shows the compile getting about 40%
> cpu. Best result here seems to be with a larger range of timeslices. ie
> 1-15 ((10*HZ)/1000...) instead lets the compile get 80% of the cpu. wonder
> if this might be the way to go?
What's the MIN/MAX_TIMESLICE range that you used to get 80% of cpu ?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:49 EST