Re: Why not "attach" patches?

From: Anton Altaparmakov (aia21@cus.cam.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 14:48:12 EST

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Penelope builds a kernel"
Previous message: Nicolas Pitre: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
In reply to: Martin Eriksson: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
Next in thread: Johan Kullstam: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Slightly off topic to lkml so replies off list please...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Martin Eriksson wrote:
> PS. I really hate OE. Anyone care to recommend THE Windoze Mail+News reader
> program, with EXTREME filtering capabilities AND not looking like crap?

I use two:

Eudora 5 for mail
Forte Free Agent for news

IMO the best GUI clients full stop.

For sending inlined patches I use elm (on Solaris) which while basic gets
the job done guaranteed without messing up the precious white space...

Best regards,

Anton

-- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "Re: Penelope builds a kernel"
Previous message: Nicolas Pitre: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
In reply to: Martin Eriksson: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
Next in thread: Johan Kullstam: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:53 EST