Re: Penelope builds a kernel

• Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [Lse-tech] zerocopy pipe, new version"
• Previous message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
• In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Penelope builds a kernel"
• Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: Penelope builds a kernel"
• Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: Penelope builds a kernel"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:28:58PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Pity the people who wrote the driver didn't use the saner approach:
> make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel SUBDIRS=`pwd` modules

Which works quite pretty with 2.2.x Makefiles and Rules.make, but
does not work with 2.4.x. I don't know if this is intentional or
just oversight.

If someone has a working makefile using this saner approach and
even support subdirs I would apreciate it[1].

Thanks & Regards

Ingo Oeser

[1] and spend him a sixpack when I meet him next time ;-)

-- 
Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else. --- D.E.Knuth
     >>>   4. Chemnitzer Linux-Tag - 09.+10. Maerz 2002 <<<
              http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [Lse-tech] zerocopy pipe, new version"
• Previous message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
• In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: Penelope builds a kernel"
• Next in thread: David Woodhouse: "Re: Penelope builds a kernel"
• Reply: David Woodhouse: "Re: Penelope builds a kernel"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:53 EST