Re: Why not "attach" patches?

From: Sebastian Benoit (benoit-lists@fb12.de)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 18:51:03 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7/I0 and nice +19"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7/I0 and nice +19"
In reply to: Patrick Mochel: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Patrick Mochel(mochel@osdl.org)@2002.01.15 14:09:27 +0000:
> Does anyone recall exactly which version this changed in? Or, have any of
> the vendors reversed this wart?

https://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHBA-2001-118.html
"The current releases of PINE 4.33 contain a whitespace mangling bug that is
fixed in this release."

/B.

-- Sebastian Benoit <benoit-lists@fb12.de> GnuPG 0x5BA22F00 2001-07-31 2999 9839 6C9E E4BF B540 C44B 4EC4 E1BE 5BA2 2F00

Buy land. They've stopped making it. -- Mark Twain.

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7/I0 and nice +19"
Previous message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler-H6/H7/I0 and nice +19"
In reply to: Patrick Mochel: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Why not "attach" patches?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:54 EST