Ben Clifford <benc@hawaga.org.uk> writes:
> The port 53 bindings happen without problem.
>
> BINDv9 has a lightweight resolver service which runs on port 921 - this is
> not enabled by default, and when it is enabled, seems to start up later on
> in the startup process.
Ok, I'm running BINDv8 right now.
> > You may use accessfs and capabilities in parallel, of course. But
> > currently, this is equivalent to "chown root/chmod u+x".
>
> Taking capabilities away seems to break backwards compatibility.
I'll think about this. I haven't heard about a working system or tools,
which use capabilities yet. So I thought, nobody would see a difference.
> And I'm not entirely sure it *is* equivalent to chown root/chmod u+x -
> that is how /mnt/accessfs/net/ipv4/bind appeared and my named couldn't
> bind to 921.
I will investigate this further. Seems, I need to install BINDv9 to
reproduce this problem.
Regards, Olaf.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:18 EST