Re: BLKGETSIZE64 (bytes or sectors?)

From: Tim Pepper (tpepper@vato.org)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2002 - 17:46:15 EST

Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: BLKGETSIZE64 (bytes or sectors?)"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] new sysctl net/ipv4/ip_default_bind"
In reply to: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com: "RE: BLKGETSIZE64 (bytes or sectors?)"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: BLKGETSIZE64 (bytes or sectors?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu 17 Jan at 16:34:50 -0600 Matt_Domsch@Dell.com done said:
>
> Yes, I agree.

Alright, I'll wait a bit to see if anybody else comments and then bounce it to
Marcello.

Tim

-- 
*********************************************************
*  tpepper@vato dot org             * Venimus, Vidimus, *
*  http://www.vato.org/~tpepper     * Dolavimus         *
*********************************************************
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: BLKGETSIZE64 (bytes or sectors?)"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] new sysctl net/ipv4/ip_default_bind"
In reply to: Matt_Domsch@Dell.com: "RE: BLKGETSIZE64 (bytes or sectors?)"
Next in thread: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: BLKGETSIZE64 (bytes or sectors?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:22 EST