Re: [question] implentation of smb-browsing: kernel space or user space?

From: Oliver Neukum (520047054719-0001@t-online.de)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2002 - 06:30:28 EST


> Therefore I had the idea, to implement this smb-browsing feature in kernel
> space. It will be a kind of network neighbourhood-filesytem with all
> computers as top level directories below the mount point.

What could a kernel space browser do that a demon could not do ?

> The first step might be to glue the autofs with smbfs and add a kernel smb
> browser as a proof of concept.

Do you say that autofs cannot be used to mount smbfs shares ?

> My question is: Do you think, that this kind of filesystem is sensible, or
> do you think that smb-stuff has to be in user space. (for example using the
> filesystem in userspace approach, shown some weeks ago)?

Smbfs itself must be in kernel. That doesn't imply that the browser has to
be in kernel.

        Regards
                Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:32 EST