Re: Possible Idea with filesystem buffering.

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 16:24:59 EST


Mark Hahn wrote:

>On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>>Write clustering is one thing it achieves. When we flush a slum, the
>>
>
>sure, that's fine. when the VM tells you to write a page,
>you're free to write *more*, but you certainly must give back
>that particular page. afaicr, this was the conclusion
>of the long-ago thread that you're referring to.
>
>regards, mark hahn.
>
>
>
This is bad for use with internal nodes. It simplifies version 4 a
bunch to assume that if a node is in cache, its parent is also. Not
sure what to do about it, maybe we need to copy the node. Surely we
don't want to copy it unless it is a DMA related page cleaning.

Hans

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:39 EST