On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Rene Rebe wrote:
> Yes. -J5 is even better here. With -J4 moving windows arround or doing
> other GUI intensive stuff was interactive for a short time (1-2
> seconds?) - and then the programm lost all interactivity (with some
> unniced gcc in the background ...). With -J5 all applications keep
> smoth even with two rebuilds (unniced) of a distribution running!
could you also compare -J5 to -J2? [use the 2.4 patch, or vanilla
2.5.3-pre4 which has J2.]
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:19 EST