Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel

• Next message: Simen Thoresen: "Re: ReiserFS and RAID5"
• Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
• In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
• Next in thread: John Levon: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
• Reply: John Levon: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Alexander Viro wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
>
> > Because you never test against X==true. You always test X!=false. This is
> > the C way.
>
> ITYM "You always test X".

I do indeed, but the bool crowd seems to like making the != explicit for
some reason.

-- 
 "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Simen Thoresen: "Re: ReiserFS and RAID5"
• Previous message: Alexander Viro: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
• In reply to: Alexander Viro: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
• Next in thread: John Levon: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
• Reply: John Levon: "Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:00:23 EST