Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin

From: Jeff Garzik (garzik@havoc.gtf.org)
Date: Tue Jan 29 2002 - 09:24:02 EST

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Assertion failure / do_get_write_acess() / loop / samba"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 02:33:24AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> I'm not proposing replacing the current subsystem maintainers. But are the
> current subsystem maintainers happy?

I think the system works, if you understand the system ;-)

Finding a maintainer for a piece of code is sometimes a jumble, but if
people want their patches in the kernel they need to be proactive about
it.

I'm -glad- Linus does not usually apply drop-n-run patches.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: Assertion failure / do_get_write_acess() / loop / samba"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:02 EST