Re: Why 'linux/fs.h' cannot be included? I *can*...

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 29 2002 - 09:51:43 EST


> Your libc should provide a "sanitized" version of the kernel headers,
> which is completely separate from any kernel sources.
>
> dietlibc does this... it's completely independent of kernel header changes.
>
> RedHat will be doing this with glibc in the future.

We already do. Red Hat shipped since about 7.0 has a seperate set of
kernel based headers that glibc uses for its own internal use, and the set
in the kernel sources.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:02 EST