On 30 Jan 2002, Momchil Velikov wrote:
>
> rat-7 is with 128-way radix tree branch factor, rat-4 is with 16-way.
Hmm. It appears that the 128-way one is no slower, at least.
Probably not very relevant question: What are the memory usage
implications? I love having that global big page_hash_table gone, but what
are the differences in memory usage between rat-4 and rat-7? In
particular, it _looks_ like the way the radix_node is done, it will
basically always be a factor-of-two+1 words, which sounds like the worst
possible schenario from an allocator standpoint.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:09 EST