> No you are wrong. This array is supposed to provide a readahead setting
> on the driver level, which is bogous, since
> it's something that *should* not be exposed to the upper layers at all.
Right.
> we have already max_readahead in struut block_device as well. Please
> note that this array only has
Ok. Now I look at it again yes - the array is completely surplus to current
requirements. 2.5 nicely sorts out the queues
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 31 2002 - 21:01:33 EST