Re: [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Sat Feb 02 2002 - 10:39:34 EST


On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> > the biggest reason for this is that we *suck* at readahead for mmap....
>
> Is there not also fault overhead and similar issues related to mmap(2)
> in general, that are not present with read(2)/write(2)?

If a fault is more expensive than a system call, we're doing
something wrong in the page fault path ;)

Rik

-- 
"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
    -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:22 EST