Re: O_DIRECT fails in some kernel and FS

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2002 - 13:49:10 EST


Joel Becker wrote:
> should know the caches might be inconsistent. Large O_DIRECT users,
> such as databases, already know this. They are happily ignorant of
> cache inconsistencies. All they care about is hardsectsize O_DIRECT
> operations.

I have similar inclination, that is inspired from the implementation of
"NTFS TNG": hard sector size should always equal sb->blocksize. This
allows for fine-grained operations at the O_DIRECT level, logical block
sizes > PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, easy implementation of fragments (>= hard sect
size), O_DIRECT for fragments, and other stuff.

This works right now in 2.4 and 2.5 with no modification to the VFS
core.

        Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | "I went through my candy like hot oatmeal
Building 1024    |  through an internally-buttered weasel."
MandrakeSoft     |             - goats.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:36 EST