Re: New scheduler in 2.4. series?

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 18:26:25 EST


On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Kristian wrote:

> Of course. But with the good old scheduler I've never had any
> problems. The system was very slow but continuously responsive. [...]

true, the old scheduler did not do much with the nice level. In the new
scheduler there is some real difference between nice levels - and this is
a feature. I'd suggest for you to try something like nice -5. What kind of
application are you renicing?

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:45 EST