Re: [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 15:46:46 EST


Hi!

> > > > > the biggest reason for this is that we *suck* at readahead for mmap....
> > > >
> > > > Is there not also fault overhead and similar issues related to mmap(2)
> > > > in general, that are not present with read(2)/write(2)?
> > >
> > > If a fault is more expensive than a system call, we're doing
> > > something wrong in the page fault path ;)
> >
> > You can read 128K at a time, but you can't fault 128K...
>
> Why not ?
>
> If the pages are present (read-ahead) and the page table
> is present, I see no reason why we couldn't fill in 32
> page table entries at once.

Ugh.

Okay, CPU will still have to fill its TLBs (it does not have to in
read case), but that is way easier operation.

I did not think about this possibility, sorry.
                                                                        Pavel

-- 
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly.  However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:49 EST