Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing

From: Florian Weimer (Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 10:17:29 EST

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:

> The long-range plan, and the real payoff, comes if main developers start
> using bk too, which should make syncing a lot easier. That will take some
> time, I suspect.

Do you think that at some point, using BitKeeper will become mandatory
for subsystem maintainers? ("mandatory" in the sense that
non-BitKeeper input is dealt with in a less timely fashion, for
example.) 

-- 
Florian Weimer 	                  Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
University of Stuttgart           http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/
RUS-CERT                          +49-711-685-5973/fax +49-711-685-5898
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:50 EST