Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 18:06:02 EST


On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 08:38:18PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hey, this looks very good! At this level of verbosity, it might be
> nice to also list modified files, but this is really good.

He generated that listing with "bk changes", you want "bk changes -v", which
I included below, but doesn't have any more useful info (yet) because the
comments are all auto generated from the email.

We will stick up a web page someplace that says "send Linus comments
like this if you want individual file comments to be different", and is
totally BK agnostic, i.e., you can send them with a regular diff -Nur
style patch and the import tools will do the right thing. Then the
verbose listing will start to be useful.

--lm

ChangeSet
  1.237 02/02/06 10:57:18 reiser@namesys.com +1 -0
  [PATCH] reiserfs fix for inodes with wrong item versions (2.5)
  
     This is hopefully last bugfix for a bug introduced by struct inode splittin
g.
     Because of setting i_flags to some value and then cleaning the i_flags
     contents later, on-disk items received wrong item version ob v3.6 filesyste
ms

  fs/reiserfs/inode.c
    1.34 02/02/06 10:57:17 reiser@namesys.com +7 -7
    reiserfs fix for inodes with wrong item versions (2.5)

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:54 EST