On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 10:13:26AM -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
> Maybe, someday there will be some sort of DEBUG flag to set in the kernel,
> from which a slew of asserts and printk's will spring to life, pointing
> out inconsistencies and bad assumptions. That is where this check would
> probably work the best.
>
Actually, there are seperate debug config options for different subsystems,
and I think that is good. The real problem is finding a way to add another
debug config option for procfs without littering the code with ifdefs...
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:19 EST