--On Thursday, 07 February, 2002 1:08 PM -0800 Mike Touloumtzis
<miket@bluemug.com> wrote:
> My understanding is that "keep features out of the kernel if possible"
> is the majority opinion, not a crackpot weirdo stance.
Mmmm... well my understanding is that the majority opinion is not
to minimize kernel functionality as a goal in isolation, but to
minimize putting into the kernel features which are done just
as well in userspace. Note the words 'just as well'. Consider,
for instance, the recent discussion (like it or not) on packing
some initrd equivalent with modules for all drivers, as opposed
to keeping said modules in separate files on traditional disk
storage. I cite this as it's about the closest analogy.
The argument comes down to 'do you want the option of dealing
with your kernel as one lump, or multiple smaller lumps' (i.e.
kernel as we know it, modules, ksysms, config file, tea cosy,
jacuzzi etc. - remember I suggested one be able to stick
any files there). It seems sensible at a distribution level to
restrict the use of this option (you could put the whole of
/bin there if you wanted). It seems perverse to reject the
concept of the option in toto, given that it's, urm, an option.
Just like any option, it is possible, though far from compulsorary,
to mindlessly abuse it.
-- Alex Bligh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:29 EST