mzawadzk@cs.stevens-tech.edu said:
> Did they change values of #defines for TUN/TAP ioctls' numbers, or
> what?
Yup, they sure did.
> If so, that's quite bad in my opinion (what if somebody had
> binary-only version of his client?).
Yup, it sure is. It screwed UML over too.
BTW, if you (or anyone else) still needs to look at working TUN/TAP code,
UML has had a TUN/TAP network backend for a while. See
arch/um/drivers/tuntap*.
I've also got persistent TUN/TAP support mostly working in my private pool,
it will appear in a patch shortly.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:50 EST