Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t

• Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t"
• Previous message: Helge Hafting: "Re: secure erasure of files?"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t"
• Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t"
• Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > dma_addr_t type. So the above usage will become
> >
> > printk("stuff: " DMA_ADDR_T_FMT " %s", a, s);
>
> Vomit. How about adding a dma_addr_t %code to the printk function ?

heh, my comment on the patch was, "about as good as you can do without
teaching printk and gcc about the type"

Can we hack gcc warnings, too?

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | "I went through my candy like hot oatmeal
Building 1024    |  through an internally-buttered weasel."
MandrakeSoft     |             - goats.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t"
• Previous message: Helge Hafting: "Re: secure erasure of files?"
• In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t"
• Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t"
• Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:53 EST