Re: small IDE cleanup: void * should not be used unless neccessary

From: Rob Landley (landley@trommello.org)
Date: Wed Feb 13 2002 - 14:39:28 EST


On Wednesday 13 February 2002 05:47 am, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > This is really easy, please apply. (It will allow me to kill few casts
> > > in future).
> > > Pavel
> > >
> > > --- linux/include/linux/ide.h Mon Feb 11 21:15:04 2002
> > > +++ linux-dm/include/linux/ide.h Mon Feb 11 22:36:12 2002
> > > @@ -529,7 +531,7 @@
> > >
> > > typedef struct hwif_s {
> > > struct hwif_s *next; /* for linked-list in ide_hwgroup_t */
> > > - void *hwgroup; /* actually (ide_hwgroup_t *) */
> > > + struct hwgroup_s *hwgroup; /* actually (ide_hwgroup_t *) */
> > > ide_ioreg_t io_ports[IDE_NR_PORTS]; /* task file registers */
> > > hw_regs_t hw; /* Hardware info */
> > > ide_drive_t drives[MAX_DRIVES]; /* drive info */
> >
> > Now I'm confused about the comment on the end of the line.
> >
> > Should the comment be changed, or should the type be ide_hwgroup_t
> > instead of struct hwgroup_s?
>
> struct hwgroup_s == ide_hwgroup_t. That's infection by hungarian
> notation, and yes it would be nice to clean it up. For now, I'm
> killing worst stuff.
> Pavel

I know they're functionally equivalent, but so was the original void *. :)

Just an "as long as you're touching this line anyway, why leave the old
comment?" thing. A minor, in-passing nit at best...

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:57 EST