Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch

From: Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org)
Date: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 09:28:12 EST

Next message: Con Kolivas: "Wrong priority reporting with new 0(1) scheduler; USB changes to 2.4.18 pre/rc1 breaks HPOJ"
Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch"
In reply to: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch"
Next in thread: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, David Howells wrote:

> Should I move the convenience bit operations back to the arch header, so that
> the M68K guys can have byte-sized flags (which they can use TAS/TST on)?

No tas needed, just byte store, so it's not only for m68k, ppc would
benefit from it too and probably some more.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Con Kolivas: "Wrong priority reporting with new 0(1) scheduler; USB changes to 2.4.18 pre/rc1 breaks HPOJ"
Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch"
In reply to: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch"
Next in thread: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:01:07 EST