I am using it, for example, on some web site, and it works well, abnd rock
solid. But on the internet, as it is today, it has no meaning
to talk about speed performances. But the server are less stressed than
with just apache.
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Benny Sjostrand wrote:
> >
> >
> >Linus put khttpd in the kernel just after sendfile support was added, IIRC
> >he said something about khttpd being a very small number of lines to add
> >once sendfile support was there.
> >
> does anyone use the khttpd service for real today ?, is there
> possibility making some useful stuff of it ? , interface it with apache
> getting better performance or whatever ...
>
> /Benny
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:01:10 EST