Ditto. Maybe I'll even get a chance to check it out on an EV7. ;)
- Pete
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:56:06AM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > Below is preliminary patch to implement some form of NUMA scheduling
> > on top of Ingo's K3 scheduler patch for 2.4.17. This is VERY early
> > code and brings up some issues that need to be discussed/explored in
> > more detail. This patch was created to form a basis for discussion,
> > rather than as a solution. The patch was created for the i386 based
> > NUMA system I have access to. It will not work on other architectures.
> > However, the only architecture specific code is a call to initialize
> > some of the NUMA specific scheduling data structures. Therefore, it
> > should be trivial to port.
>
> Ah, you beat me to it; I was working on code very similar to this when
> I got your e-mail. I think this sort of thing will address the
> problem we've been seeing on machines with more than 16 cpus or so
> (IDLE_REBALANCE_TICK is too small, flooding CPUs with load_balance
> requests), as well as making numa scheduling a little more efficient.
> I'll see if I can make it work on our platform and let you know how it
> goes.
>
> Jesse
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lse-tech mailing list
> Lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lse-tech
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:44 EST