Re: Eepro100 driver.

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 16:57:21 EST

Next message: Balbir Singh: "Re: [PATCH] Trivial patch against mempool"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.5-pre1 IDE cleanup 9"
In reply to: endre@interware.hu: "Re: Eepro100 driver."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

endre@interware.hu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > > Would be a lot nicer to see someone spending the time pulling the
> > > useful bits out of e100 and putting it into eepro100. e100 is ugly and
> > > bloated for no reason.
> >
> > When it passes my review, it will not be.
> > e100 + my desired changes == eepro100 + my desired changes
>
> Will it be possible to use the vlan code in the kernel with e100? From
> what I can see Intel has its own way of doing vlans and that seems
> powerful but overcomplicated to me.

If it's non-standard, it's not getting in the kernel. We have VLAN
stuff already...

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | "UNIX enhancements aren't."
Building 1024    |           -- says /usr/games/fortune
MandrakeSoft     |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Balbir Singh: "Re: [PATCH] Trivial patch against mempool"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.5-pre1 IDE cleanup 9"
In reply to: endre@interware.hu: "Re: Eepro100 driver."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:46 EST