Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@zip.com.au)
Date: Sat Feb 23 2002 - 17:40:58 EST


yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>
> Is this part of some scheme to make the GPL support model actually
> pay?

No, no, no. It's all the uncommented code which brings in the dollars.
 
> c = smp_get_cpuid(); // disables preemption
>
> ...
> f(); // oops, me forgotee, this function also references cpuid
> ..
> x = ++local_cache[c]; // live dangerously
> smp_put_cpuid(); // G_d knows what that does now.
>

preempt_disable() nests. It's not a problem.

-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:53 EST