Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4

From: Markus Schaber (markus.schaber@student.uni-ulm.de)
Date: Mon Feb 25 2002 - 04:52:55 EST

Next message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Previous message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
In reply to: Simon Kirby: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Next in thread: Juan Quintela: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

Simon Kirby wrote:

> I remember Borland Turbo Pascal's compiler... Yes, yes, but that thing
> compiled insane amounts of code in split seconds on 386 hardware.

But don't forget: Pascal was designed to ease the work of compiler
writers - at least ANSI Pascal is easy to compile using a single-pass
recursive descent compiler. And there wasn't so much optimization.

markus

-- Markus Schaber - http://www.schabi.de/

Check in to another world - test a _real_ OS.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Previous message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
In reply to: Simon Kirby: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Next in thread: Juan Quintela: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:13 EST