On February 25, 2002 08:31 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ok I see where you are coming from now -- that makes sense for a few
> > cases.
>
> Note that the "few cases" in question imply _all_ of the current broken
> library spinlocks, for example.
>
> Don't think "POSIX semaphores", but think "fast locking" in the general
> case. I will bet you $1 in small change that most normal locking by far is
> for the kind of thread-safe stuff libc does right now.
This looks like another piece of the equation needed to make Larry's smp
cluster concept come true. So...
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:24 EST