Re: Linux 2.4.18

• Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [Lse-tech] NUMA scheduling"
• Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree"
• In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: Linux 2.4.18"
• Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux 2.4.18"
• Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux 2.4.18"
• Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: Linux 2.4.18"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Matthias Andree wrote:

> I'd think that running a script to "upgrade" 2.4.N-rcM to 2.4.N by just
> unpacking that latest rc tarball, editing the Makefile and tarring
> things up again, should be safe enough, and if it doesn't allow for
> operator interference, especially so.

Seems to me:
- clean EXTRAVERSION
- make new diff
- make tar (one please)
- make tar.gz from tar
- compress tar to tar.bz2

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [Lse-tech] NUMA scheduling"
• Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree"
• In reply to: Matthias Andree: "Re: Linux 2.4.18"
• Next in thread: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux 2.4.18"
• Reply: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux 2.4.18"
• Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: Linux 2.4.18"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:24 EST