On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 17:39, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> I'd really like to see XFS go in, but don't you think 2.5 is the place,
> with a view to 2.4 submission in due course?
This is my thinking, but the way 2.5 is diverging the argument that
xfs being stable in 2.5 prior to going into 2.4 probably will not mean
too much at the end of the day since the interfaces will probably
have diverged so much by then - and the interfaces are where the
nasties tend to come out. The core of XFS is pretty darn stable.
>
> As far as making the case goes, do you have time to make a list of
> places where XFS goes outside fs/xfs, and why?
I have had about 20 emails since I got yours ;-) One of the reasons
I have not been attempting to submit XFS is that I have too many
other things going on right now, hopefully things are getting
quieter and I can take a shot at this again. I will see how tomorrow
goes ....
Steve
>
> --
> Daniel
--Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@sgi.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:34 EST