Re: Linux 2.4.19pre1-ac1

From: Florin Iucha (florin@iucha.net)
Date: Thu Feb 28 2002 - 01:31:13 EST

Next message: Ravikiran G Thirumalai: "Re: [Lse-tech] lockmeter results comparing 2.4.17, 2.5.3, and 2.5.5"
Previous message: Raghu Angadi: "Re: Fw: memory corruption in tcp bind hash buckets on SMP?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.19pre1-ac1"
Next in thread: Jonathan Hudson: "Re: Linux 2.4.19pre1-ac1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:41:26PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> What compiler firstly, and what I/O subsystem. Are you using highmem,
> did you build from a clean tree ?

florin@bee:~$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs
gcc version 2.95.4 (Debian prerelease)

00:05.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)

No highmem (256Mb)

Clean tree 2.4.17 -> 2.4.18 -> 2.4.19-pre1 -> 2.4.19-pre1-ac1

Problem gone in 2.4.19-pre1-ac2, patched from clean tree, built on
2.4.18-rc2-ac1. Weird...

It looks like something is hosed in the 2.4.19-pre1-ac1 patchset.

florin

"If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is."

41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ravikiran G Thirumalai: "Re: [Lse-tech] lockmeter results comparing 2.4.17, 2.5.3, and 2.5.5"
Previous message: Raghu Angadi: "Re: Fw: memory corruption in tcp bind hash buckets on SMP?"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.4.19pre1-ac1"
Next in thread: Jonathan Hudson: "Re: Linux 2.4.19pre1-ac1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:41 EST