Re: [2.4.18] OOPS in smbfs

• Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: Patch - sharing RTC timer between kernel and user space"
• Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt"
• In reply to: Urban Widmark: "Re: [2.4.18] OOPS in smbfs"
• Next in thread: Christian Bornträger : "Re: [2.4.18] OOPS in smbfs"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Le Thu, Feb 28, 2002, à 03:34:53PM +0100, Urban Widmark a écrit:

> Does 2.4.17 work fine for everyone?
> Did any of you try something between 2.4.18-pre4 and 2.4.18-rc2?

Previously, that machine was running 2.4.17-pre8. It was running fine with
smbfs, but had never been asked to touch the NT server I mentioned. OTOH,
with the 2.4.18-rc4 kernel, I can touch other Win2K (workstation) machines
with no harmful effects.

I would like to avoid going back to 2.4.18-rc2 (lack of time to compile), if
someone with identical oopes had the time the better. But if no-one does
before tomorrow, I'll try that version.

        -- Cyrille

-- 
Grumpf.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: Patch - sharing RTC timer between kernel and user space"
• Previous message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt"
• In reply to: Urban Widmark: "Re: [2.4.18] OOPS in smbfs"
• Next in thread: Christian Bornträger : "Re: [2.4.18] OOPS in smbfs"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:42 EST