Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 15:23:44 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel thread --> user process"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
In reply to: Julian Anastasov: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Next in thread: Ben Greear: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Reply: Ben Greear: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Reply: Julian Anastasov: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Reply: Karl: "RE: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> As for (2) I don't see how this can be remotely
> exploited but my opinion is that it should be fixed.

"Fixed" ? How do you fix standards compliant behaviour ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: kernel thread --> user process"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
In reply to: Julian Anastasov: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Next in thread: Ben Greear: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Reply: Ben Greear: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Reply: Julian Anastasov: "Re: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Reply: Karl: "RE: Network Security hole (was -> Re: arp bug )"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:24 EST