Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On March 1, 2002 09:26 am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > A bunch of patches which implement allocate-on-flush for 2.5.6-pre1 are
> > available at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.6-pre1/dalloc-10-core.patch
> > - Core functions
> > and
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.6-pre1/dalloc-20-ext2.patch
> > - delalloc implementation for ext2.
> Wow, this is massive. Why did you write [patch] instead of [PATCH]? ;-) I'm
> surprised there aren't any comments on this patch so far, that should teach
> you to post on a Friday afternoon.
My only comment is: how fast can we get delalloc into 2.5.x for further
testing and development?
IMNSHO there are few comments because I believe that few people actually
realize the benefits of delalloc. My ext2 filesystem with --10--
percent fragmentation could sure use code like this, though.
> > But it may come unstuck when applied to swapcache.
>
> You're not even trying to apply this to swap cache right now are you?
This is a disagreement akpm and I have, actually :)
I actually would rather that it was made a requirement that all
swapfiles are "dense", so that new block allocation NEVER must be
performed when swapping.
> There is also my nefarious plan to make
> struct pages refer to variable-binary-sized objects, including smaller than
> 4K PAGE_SIZE.
sigh...
-- Jeff Garzik | Building 1024 | MandrakeSoft | Choose life. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:30 EST