Re: [patch] delayed disk block allocation

From: Mike Fedyk (mfedyk@matchmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 04 2002 - 00:04:50 EST


On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:08:54AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> The main disconnect there is sub-page sized writes, you will bundle together
> young and old 1K buffers. Since it's getting harder to find a 1K blocksize
> filesystem, we might not care.

Please don't do that.

Hopefully, once this is in, 1k blocks will work much better. There are many
cases where people work with lots of small files, and using 1k blocks is bad
enough, 4k would be worse.

Also, with dhash going into ext2/3 lots of tiny files in one dir will be
feasible and comparible with reiserfs.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:31 EST