On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 04:20:25PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> 1 - didn't try, I checked that the patch had not been reverted, and
> assumed that if it was broken and not changed it was broken still.
> And I only looked in pre2-ac2, if it was fixed and Alan patched it
> back broken.
Well, try it. The correct patch is in there.
> 2 - understanding vast stretches of uncommented code you may need to
> change is worthwhile reading. The corolary is that comments are worthwhile
> typing.
(You must have missed the ChangeLog.)
Tim.
*/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:47 EST