OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du mercredi 06 mars 2002, vers 03:18,
Shawn Starr <spstarr@sh0n.net> disait:
> What change did you have to make with rml's patch? Some people are
> wondering. I haven't tried it yet.
A very trivial change, I have just merged this one by hand :
***************
*** 318,323 ****
unsigned long policy;
unsigned long cpus_allowed;
unsigned int time_slice;
task_t *next_task, *prev_task;
--- 322,328 ----
unsigned long policy;
unsigned long cpus_allowed;
unsigned int time_slice;
+ unsigned long flags;
task_t *next_task, *prev_task;
Otherwise, the patch apply cleanly.
I attach you the corrected patch (I don't knwo why, it is
significiantly larger than the original patch, I have used diff -Naur,
I hope I don't get lost when I did it, it is surely better to use the
original patch and to do the little merge by hand)
-- /* * We used to try various strange things. Let's not. */ 2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:53 EST