On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:40:44AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I also prefer not to use Bitkeeper as long as possible for similar reasons
> and because it is too slow and clumpsy
> (although it is already very hard because often source is only available
> through it, e.g. for ppc or for 2.5 pre patches now -- hopefully this trend
> does not continue)
Something I've not yet worked out is why none of the proponents of
arch, subversion etc are offering to run a mirror of Linus'
bitkeeper tree for those who don't want to use bk, but
"must have 0-day kernels".
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:54 EST