Re: [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:10:03 EST

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: a faster way to gettimeofday? rdtsc strangeness"
Previous message: Neil Brown: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
In reply to: Hank Yang: "Re: [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> That's because the linux-kernel misunderstand the raid controller
> to IDE controller. If do so, The raid driver will be unstable when
> be loaded.
> So we must to prevent the raio controller to be as IDE controller
> here.

The ataraid driver in the standard kernel requires the IDE drive is seen
by the ide layer otherwise ataraid cannot bind it into a raid module

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: a faster way to gettimeofday? rdtsc strangeness"
Previous message: Neil Brown: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
In reply to: Hank Yang: "Re: [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:01:13 EST