Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?

• Next message: Paul Mackerras: "Re: [bkpatch] do_mmap cleanup"
• Previous message: Urban Widmark: "Re: LFS support for smbfs in 2.5, and other improvements"
• Next in thread: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
• Reply: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

Cort Dougan wrote:

> Only doing a given merge once is great. That's a big time-saver over the
> long term.

Could someone explain me, how this "merge once" works? How is this
different from cvs? I mean, cvs is capable of doing merges, if new
changes are not at the same position.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Paul Mackerras: "Re: [bkpatch] do_mmap cleanup"
• Previous message: Urban Widmark: "Re: LFS support for smbfs in 2.5, and other improvements"
• Next in thread: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
• Reply: Kurt Roeckx: "Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:12 EST