Re: [PATCH] syscall interface for cpu affinity

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Sun Mar 10 2002 - 17:11:28 EST


On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 17:05, Chris Wedgwood wrote:

> Can't wer just copy the IRIX interface here as some other pathces have
> in the past?

Is that psets? If so, no thanks.

I want a simple, clean, quick implementation. I have seen patches that
do a lot more than what my simple implementation does, and that really
does not interest me and I suspect Ingo and others feel the same way.
Setting a simple per-task bitmask that is inherited is all we need.

Linux scheduler API is already our own standard. I'd rather support
that (i.e. add another simple sched_* call) than some evil other
interface - but that is just me.

        Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:14 EST