Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes

From: H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 14:46:18 EST


Followup to: <a6qtb8$6fg$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
By author: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I suspect the _real_ solution is to stop using "inb_p/outb_p" and make
> the delay explicit, although it may be that some drivers depend on the
> fact that not only is the "outb $0x80" a delay, it also tends to act as
> a posting barrier.
>

... as well as a push-out to the ISA bus. I suspect dumping the outb
way of doing it and instead wait in the CPU might cause the delay to
happen in the wrong part of the system (consider split-transaction
queued busses like HyperTransport, where a delay in the CPU doesn't
necessarily mean a delay in the southbridge.)

Port 0x80 has served us well, at least as a default. If you really
care about the POST display you can recompile using a different port.

        -hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST