Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes

From: John Heil (kerndev@sc-software.com)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 17:39:56 EST


On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:55:45 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> To: John Heil <kerndev@sc-software.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: IO delay, port 0x80, and BIOS POST codes
>
> > > It is, in fact, broken on several systems -- I tried ED in SYSLINUX
> > > for a while, and it broke things for people.
> >
> > It does work on many, in fact, we used on a Crusoe based platform
> > as well as the other x86s
> >
> > Let's make it a configurable kernel debug/hacking option else
> > we have the added burden of chasing down a common address.
>
> We've got one. Its 0x80. It works everywhere with only marginal non
> problematic side effects
>

Ok, cool but does that mean you agree or disagree with a configurable
override for those of us in the minority?

Johnh

-
-----------------------------------------------------------------
John Heil
South Coast Software
Custom systems software for UNIX and IBM MVS mainframes
1-714-774-6952
johnhscs@sc-software.com
http://www.sc-software.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST