Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Node affine NUMA scheduler

From: Erich Focht (focht@ess.nec.de)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 21:03:22 EST


On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:

> Beware of optimizing for the benchmark. In real life, exec is likely
> a much better place for the balancing.

:-) Thanks for the warning. I'll play around with the possibilities by (at
least temporarilly) including a node_policy or balance_policy. I'm having
in mind some big OpenMP codes which could benefit of initial balancing
which they won't get in do_exec().

Regards,
Erich

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:19 EST